MMA Tete-A-Tete: Luke & Nate look back at UFC 177

Kid Nate of is joined by special guest Luke Thomas of to talk about the various promotional snafus that are likely to make UFC 177 the lowest selling…

16 comments on “MMA Tete-A-Tete: Luke & Nate look back at UFC 177”

  1. optimine says:

    It’s so annoying to see Dana cut people like Jake Shields ’cause he doesn’t
    want to pay him 75 000 when he’s the kinda guy who could have helped a card
    like last night especially since he was actually there already. : P

  2. optimine says:

    I almost couldn’t watch the Ferguson/Castillo decision. Danny won it in my

  3. Mike C. says:

    There’s some really good scholarly talk here! I enjoy the term viz-a-viz.

  4. Jacob Goranson says:

    This tete-a-tete fills me with Weltschmerz. Also made me laugh a few times,

  5. gizmo nala says:

    Luke Thomas is even better uncensored. Now i want uncensored Helwani, get
    it done Nate!

  6. Gabriel Verdon says:

    I was a guy on twitter who requested Luke come on this show, so thank you!
    I watch all the Bloody Elbow/Kid Nate vids here and I really enjoyed seeing
    you two chat in a more informal setting here.

  7. MrColdwatercanyon says:


  8. Kefka says:

    Two fav MMA bloggers hating on the UFC sweet.

  9. Smirk says:

    I think there should be four pay per views a year. Those four should be the
    numbered UFC cards. The numbering of cards means nothing. Stack four ppvs a
    year and sell a ton.

  10. Yousef Almalki says:

    Omg live how fo you be live

  11. optimine says:

    I think about the saturation thing they just need to essentially create so
    many different fighters and situations that they can use in a varied way of
    their choosing. They simply know they want “more”.

  12. optimine says:

    ya, I have to admit, that kinda confusion in logic when the “better” fights
    are free would piss me off if I bought pay per view. 

  13. optimine says:

    Soto saved the respectability. 

  14. optimine says:

    as an animal lover I can’t help but appreciate the hallowed showing of the

  15. optimine says:

    my theory is they know pay per view is dead in the long run. just a guess.
    so they’re thinking about different models whatever that means.

  16. optimine says:

    you guys (luke especially) like to talk about the dilution of the ufc but
    thankfully that only matters if you’re paying to watch the events. 

Leave a Reply

Related Posts